Medical Device Labeling: Regulatory Requirements for Medical Device Manufacturers

Medical device manufacturers spend considerable resources to research and develop products used by medical professionals and consumers in the market. And due to the criticality of these products as it relates to the health and safety of the end consumer, these manufacturers must ensure that products meet the necessary quality and regulatory standards.

Medical device labeling is also a key element of manufacturers' efforts to comply with the standards and regulations instituted by relevant regulatory bodies including the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Union’s Medical Device Regulation (MDR).

Ensuring medical devices and related products are accurately labeled is critical for traceability and enables businesses to more easily remove specific products from circulation in the market in the event of a recall.

Offering products without the required and appropriate medical device labels can result in undesired consequences because faulty or defective products are prone to causing injury or death for the end consumer. Additionally, compliance and regulatory bodies can also take legal action against the manufacturer resulting in massive fines and reputational damage.

This concise guide explores medical device labeling and the details manufacturers must include on labels when assembling and packaging their products.

[Watch our On-Demand Webinar] How to Make Traceability Your Competitive Advantage →

For proper and comprehensive compliance and safety, regulators define parameters and factors manufacturers should follow when making medical device products. As such, medical devices can be defined differently depending on the regulators’ jurisdiction.

In the U.S., the FDA defines a medical device as an instrument, apparatus, implement, machine, or related item intended for application in disease diagnosis, prevention, cure, and mitigation in humans and animals.

The European Union takes a similar line when classifying a medical device. The MDR defines it as an instrument, apparatus, appliance, software, implant, reagent, or another article primarily used for diagnosing, monitoring, preventing, treating, or alleviating diseases, disabilities, injuries, and other physiological and pathological states.

And like its American counterpart, the MDR insists that medical devices should affect their primary purpose without pharmacological, immunological, or metabolic means in or on the human body.

Medical device labeling refers to information and details attached to products by manufacturers. These details include symbols, instructions, warnings, as well as control information. Medical manufacturers label devices by printing, machining, coding, and molding.

Governmental and institutional organizations require manufacturers to provide comprehensive information about the product to the user to ensure and maintain safety for the consumer.

And to ensure that manufacturers append the correct and necessary information to the product, the US FDA and EU MDR issue regulations for labeling medical devices. For instance, manufacturers must follow specific rules regarding label size, placement, and product information.

Labeling medical devices is essential for both the manufacturer and the consumer. Some of the key reasons these labels are so important include:

Safety: Patients and medical personnel often need instructions to guide them through using the product or device.

For example, many individuals own epinephrine pens to deliver adrenaline in the case of an allergic reaction. The manufacturers of these devices must attach instructions on how to use the pen in case of an emergency.

Additionally, the manufacturer’s label must show how the patient or caregiver should handle the pen during storage and other functions. For instance, a label should indicate if the pen should be kept at a specific temperature to ensure that the medical agent within it still affects patients as intended.

All this avoids potential patient danger ranging from minor allergic reactions to a variety of life-threatening conditions.

Compliance: Regulatory bodies require manufacturers to label medical devices and related products properly. Proper labeling shows these organizations that the company complies with the set guidelines.

In the US, medical device labeling requirements are outlined in 21 CFR Part 801, specifying the minimum requirements for all devices. These requirements can include label placement and prominence, what types of information must be included on containers and outside labels, adequate instructions for use, servicing instructions, as well as prescription device requirements.

Additionally, there are a number of other requirements that manufacturers may need to meet depending on the specific category of device.

Manufacturer identification: Both EU and US medical device labeling regulations require the inclusion of various manufacturer information on the device label to ensure traceability and accountability. These details will vary by jurisdiction (country, region, etc.)

In the US, the FDA stipulates that a label must be present on the immediate container and additional packaging on the item. This means manufacturers are also expected to append labels to brochures, inserts, booklets, and other articles accompanying the product when it’s presented to the market.

The FDA’s general labeling requirements are stipulated in CFR Title 21 Part 801. Per the stipulations:

• Medical device labels in the U.S. must show the name and location of the business

• The label shows the intended device use

• Adequate instructions for the ordinary person to use the item safely

• The label must be prominently displayed

• The label should have Unique Device Identifiers (UDI) for track and trace purposes

The European device label regulations, detailed in Annex I Chapter III of the EU MDR, align with the FDA’s requirements. However, the EU also requires manufacturers to add updated medical device label information on the company’s website.

FDA 21 CFR Part 801
Part 801 sets the foundation. It spells out what has to appear on the label i.e. manufacturer name, intended use, instructions and how it must look. The FDA’s definition of “labeling” goes beyond the sticker or packaging. It includes inserts, instructions for use, and anything else that travels with the product.

For the operations team, that means everything printed, packed, or distributed under that device’s name must line up. Content has to be correct, consistent, and updated when anything changes. Labels must stay readable for as long as the device is in use. And depending on the device class, you may need to include specific warnings or risk details.

A small error like a missing statement or outdated IFU, can pull an entire batch into question.

21 CFR Part 11
Once labeling records go digital, Part 11 applies. It governs how those records and electronic signatures are created, secured, and verified. Systems must protect data from tampering, control user access, and maintain clear audit trails. Electronic signatures carry the same legal weight as handwritten ones, but only if the system can prove authenticity.

These controls aren’t optional. When the FDA audits, they look for evidence that every change, review, and approval can be traced.

Unique Device Identification (UDI)
The UDI system links each device to a unique identifier recorded in the Global UDI Database (GUDID). It’s designed to improve traceability in the field, especially when dealing with recalls or adverse event reports. Each UDI must come from an FDA-accredited agency, appear on the label, and, when required, be permanently marked on the device itself.

Trouble often starts when UDIs are managed manually across separate systems. That’s where mismatched data and version issues creep in, leading to labeling errors that can put compliance at risk.

Electronic Labeling
More manufacturers are moving toward electronic labeling to keep up with global market requirements. Systems now need to manage multilingual content, electronic instructions for use (eIFUs), and secure access for authorized users.

The key is control, having one verified source of truth for label data and version history. When labeling connects directly with the QMS or MES, changes flow through without relying on manual updates or email approvals.

If you manufacture or distribute medical devices in Europe, Regulation (EU) 2017/745 known as the EU MDR, defines what compliance really means. The regulation reshaped how devices are classified and assessed, but it also raised the bar for labeling accuracy, clarity, and accessibility.

Under the MDR, labeling isn’t just part of the packaging process, it’s part of the device’s safety and performance profile.

Core Labeling Requirements

Each device label must:

• State the device’s intended purpose

• Identify both the manufacturer and the authorized representative

• Include warnings, precautions, and usage conditions

• Display the device’s UDI and Basic UDI-DI

• Indicate sterilization status, single-use information, and expiration date when relevant

Instructions for Use (IFUs) also fall under labeling requirements. They have to be easy to understand and presented in a format suitable for the person using the device e.g. if it’s a clinician, technician, or patient.

CE Marking and Multi-Language Control

A CE mark can’t appear on a device unless every related label and IFU meets MDR expectations. That includes translations, symbols, and regional variations. Manufacturers have to manage:

• Multiple language versions across EU member states

• Country-specific labeling rules and symbols

• Updates triggered by design changes, re-certifications, or post-market findings

Where labeling often fails is in execution i.e. missed translation updates, version mismatches, or documentation gaps. Each one can stall shipments or raise flags during audits.

Using Digital Systems to Stay Compliant
Managing EU labeling manually across several markets is hard to sustain. Digital labeling systems make it easier to control content, versions, and approvals from a single source. When these systems connect with PLM, ERP, and QMS platforms, label data stays synchronized with design and quality records.

Modern platforms also support electronic IFUs and allow controlled digital access for users, which helps reduce printing and translation costs.

When labeling data is centralized and traceable, teams spend less time chasing updates and more time maintaining compliance.

Labeling mistakes rarely start with bad intent. Most come from the everyday realities of production like tight deadlines, manual steps, and disconnected systems. Each of these can quietly create risk that isn’t obvious until it surfaces during an audit, a complaint, or a recall.

1. Manual Errors in Label Creation
In many facilities, labeling is still handled by hand. Product data gets copied into templates, artwork files get adjusted manually, and operators move fast to keep lines running. Every one of those steps is a chance for something small to go wrong.

A misplaced symbol, a wrong storage condition, or a label printed from an outdated file can put a shipment on hold or trigger a recall. It’s not just the cost of rework, it’s the hit to credibility when customers start double-checking your labels.

2. Data Inconsistencies Across Systems
Label data often comes from several places like ERP, PLM, QMS and those systems don’t always stay in sync. The engineering team may update a part number while the labeling template still carries the old one. A UDI record might be correct in one database and out of date in another.

These mismatches often go unnoticed until late in the process, sometimes after product release. Without a single, controlled source of data, inconsistencies become routine instead of rare.

3. Version Control Gaps
Devices change. Instructions change. Regulatory classifications shift. When documentation control doesn’t keep pace, there’s no clear way to confirm which label or IFU version should be on the line.

Teams patch the gap with spreadsheets, shared folders, or old email threads. That might work for a short run but falls apart under audit conditions or when multiple sites need to use the same information.

4. Limited Traceability Across Distributed Operations
When a labeling issue surfaces, the first question is always the same: where did it happen? Without proper traceability, the answer takes days to find.

If label versions are stored across shared drives, network folders, or standalone systems, there’s no reliable trail linking label, operator, and batch. Root cause analysis becomes guesswork, and the same problem can reappear before the first one is even closed.

Digital labeling isn’t about fancy software. It’s about getting control of the data that ends up on a product and knowing it’s right every time. Most plants already have barcodes and printers. The real shift comes when labeling ties into the same systems that run production and quality, so what’s approved on paper is exactly what hits the line.

Digital Batch Records and Automation
Manual label work still trips people up. Somebody re-keys a date, copies the wrong revision, or prints from an old folder. Once labeling sits inside a digital batch record, that step goes away. Lot numbers, expiry dates, and UDIs pull straight from master data instead of a spreadsheet. The batch record forces the label step to happen in the right order and logs who did it. No extra forms. No guesswork later when QA asks for proof.

Automation helps keep labels tied to the product record instead of floating around as separate files. It also makes it easier to spot when something’s out of sync before it leaves the floor.

Real-Time Checks
Good systems catch mistakes before the printer does. If an operator selects the wrong part or tries to use an outdated spec, the screen throws a stop. It’s a small thing but saves hours of sorting through rework or investigating a labeling deviation later.

These in-line checks cut down on the last-minute quality reviews that used to slow everything down.

Tying Labeling into MES and QMS
Labeling touches nearly everything—design, quality, production, shipping. When the labeling app connects to MES and QMS, the process starts and stops with the same approvals. You can block a batch from printing labels until QA signs off or automatically log each print against the device history record.

That link makes traceability automatic instead of another spreadsheet chore.

Using Tulip to Manage It All
Tulip gives you one place to hold label data like device IDs, UDIs, lots, expiry info without passing files between teams. Data updates once, everywhere.

It hooks into ERP and PLM so the label always reflects the current product spec. No manual syncs. No old artwork sneaking back in.

When labeling steps live inside Tulip’s digital work instructions, operators follow on-screen cues and scans. Every print, every change, every approval gets a timestamp and a name attached. If a question comes up later, you can trace it in minutes instead of digging through binders.

That’s what keeps the process clean and the auditors calm.

If you’re interested in learning how you can implement Tulip to optimize your quality and compliance initiatives, please feel free to reach out to a member of our team today!

Because of the purpose that labeling serves as it relates to safety and compliance, it is crucial that manufacturers are able to consistently and accurately label their products in accordance with the established guidelines.

Using Tulip, medical device manufacturers are able to streamline their product labeling and packaging process by integrating data from their system with label printers.

By leveraging the system(s) responsible for guiding production processes, manufacturers are able to reduce errors resulting from manual human input and ensure the accuracy of label details. This allows businesses and regulators to improve product traceability, making compliance a seamless part of their production and packaging processes.

In medical device manufacturing, labeling sits at the center of control and compliance. It’s the proof that what leaves your line matches what was approved. It also protects the people who rely on your product.

Regulations vary i.e. FDA, EU MDR, internal procedures but the aim doesn’t change. Each label has to be right, traceable, and backed by records that can stand up to inspection.

Digital systems make that easier. They take the repetition out of labeling work, pull data from verified sources, and keep versions locked to the right batch or device. Teams spend less time checking files and more time running production with confidence.

With expectations tightening across every market, labeling that can hold up under pressure isn’t a nice-to-have anymore. It’s the foundation of a compliant operation.