Production Capacity: Strategies for Improving Productivity and Efficiency

Manufacturing businesses are always looking to maximize their available resources to increase productivity and minimize production costs. Manufacturers in today’s competitive environment are increasingly investing their resources into accurate production planning and scheduling to get a handle on lead times.

Calculating production capacity is one of the basic steps manufacturers can take to understand the maximum output of their facilities.

Furthermore, manufacturers rely on production capacity figures to make sound financial plans and accurately project business growth. As such, businesses need to properly calculate production capacity to inform their business decisions over time.

This guide details production capacity, extending past the basics to effective, implementable strategies to improve a manufacturing operation’s productivity and efficiency. Read on to find out more.

Download Forrester Total Economic Impact™ of Tulip’s Frontline Operations Platform →

Production capacity is the maximum product output a company can produce using its available resources over a specified amount of time. This metric is important because it informs a manufacturer’s critical business decisions in both the near and long-term.

For instance, if a manufacturing business wants to fulfill a higher quantity of larger orders, the decision-makers need to know if the operation can sufficiently meet the increase in demand. Additionally, manufacturers use production capacity to inform labor utilization as well as capex decisions including their machines, equipment, and facilities.

Therefore, it’s important for manufacturers to know their operation’s production capacity because it informs both administrative and in-facility decisions, enabling businesses to maximize their production efficiency.

Every manufacturer wants to get more out of what’s already on the floor. But before you can raise output, you need a reliable view of how capacity is actually performing. Getting that view is harder than it looks.

Bottlenecks and Downtime
Every line has a slow point. If you’re not tracking it, you’re guessing. A single piece of equipment running slow, a batch of unplanned downtime, or a lopsided workflow can quietly strangle throughput. By the time the problem shows up in your numbers, you’re already behind and scrambling to catch up.

Workforce and Scheduling Limits
Machines don’t run themselves. Training gaps, thin staffing, or rigid schedules can hold back production even when equipment is ready. Seasonal swings make the problem worse and sometimes you’re short-handed, other times you’re paying for labor you don’t fully use.

Equipment Age and Maintenance
Older assets often mean longer maintenance windows and less insight into performance. They may still run, but if you’re relying on gut feel or reactive fixes, you’ll underestimate how much downtime is costing you.

Demand Variability
Forecasting only gets you so far. A sudden rush of orders or an unexpected dip can throw off plans overnight. Without flexible ways to adjust capacity, you risk overpromising to customers or tying up cash in inventory that doesn’t move.

As earlier discussed, production capacity provides key management personnel and business executives with vital information to make wide-ranging decisions regarding their operations.

Determining a manufacturing business’ production capacity varies depending on the kind of operation at hand. For instance, calculating production capacity for a high-mix, low volume operation will be quite different than a high-volume, mass production-type business.

The first hurdle to getting your production capacity is determining machine hour capacity. This refers to the potential number of hours that a machine can be used to create products.

Machine hour capacity = number of usable machines X number of working hours

With this in hand, you can calculate production capacity for an operation that produces one type of product by factoring in the time it takes to make just one item.

Therefore, the production capacity formula:

Single item production capacity = machine hour capacity ÷ time taken to produce an item

Let’s take an example of a textile company making graphic t-shirts. Employees work 8 hours a day using 20 design-to-garment (DTG) printers to make t-shirts. It takes workers 15 minutes to complete one t-shirt.

Machine hour capacity = 8 X 20 = 160 machine hours

Time to make one shirt = 0.25 hours

Production capacity = 160 ÷ 0.25 = 640 t-shirts per day

For businesses looking to scale up their operations, there are a couple of different options they can explore to increase production capacity. A few examples include:

Add more work shifts: A manufacturing business can increase production capacity by lengthening the amount of time available for production. Manufacturers can do this by instituting overtime pay to encourage employees to work extra hours.

Alternatively, manufacturers can adopt a shift-based operation. Different groups of employees ensure that the machines run longer, increasing production capacity significantly.

Outsource production: Sometimes, your machinery might be working at its peak, but not enough to meet consumer demand. Manufacturing businesses can increase production capacity by outsourcing the work to a contract manufacturer to help meet demand in the short-term.

Adopt lean manufacturing practices: Lean manufacturing practices ensure that production operations run as efficiently as possible, eliminating different forms of waste that can take place in a manufacturing facility.

As a result, all inputs go towards ensuring that machines and employees are working towards delivering more products.

Improve equipment effectiveness: Adopting proactive machine maintenance ensures that the equipment is always in good working condition. Consequently, there’s less machine downtime to interrupt the production operation.

By maximizing overall equipment effectiveness (OEE), businesses are able to marginally increase production capacity.

Invest in new machinery: If your budget allows, you can obtain new machinery to increase output. This is more feasible when the existing equipment is already working at full capacity but still doesn’t meet your capacity requirements. These types of capex purchases are important to consider for businesses looking to grow over longer time horizons, whereas outsourcing may be a better option for businesses looking for a short-term fix to supply constraints as a result of seasonality, for example.

Capacity decisions set the tone for how well you handle shifts in demand. Pick the wrong path and you can end up stuck with idle equipment, late shipments, or cash tied up in the wrong places. A framework gives you a structured way to think through those choices.

1) Lead, Lag, and Match Strategies

Most manufacturers approach expansion in one of three ways:

• Lead: Build extra capacity before the orders arrive. This works when markets are climbing fast, but if the forecast is off you’re left carrying the cost.

• Lag: Wait until demand shows up before investing. It protects cash, but you’ll always be trailing demand and recovery takes longer.

• Match: Add capacity in smaller steps. It keeps you closer to actual demand, though it puts more pressure on planning and day-to-day visibility.

Each path trades one risk for another. Lead spends money early, Lag risks unhappy customers, Match keeps you nimble but demands tighter coordination.

2) Scenario Planning and Forecasting

No plan survives unchanged. Building a few demand scenarios i.e. best case, worst case, middle of the road, lets you decide in advance how you’ll respond when numbers move. The forecast matters, but what matters more is having a clear answer when sales are 15% higher or lower than you expected.

Putting It Into Practice
Take a mid-sized electronics plant growing about 10% per year. They choose the match approach:

• In the next six months, they add a second shift and train operators across multiple machines.

• Over the following year, they buy modular equipment that can ramp with volume.

• Beyond 18 months, they plan to open a satellite line in another facility.

They set triggers for each phase. If orders climb past a certain point, they move ahead. If demand slows, they hold. That way they’re not locked into a single path and they adjust as conditions change.

Every production line has a weakest point. That’s the essence of the Theory of Constraints (TOC): your output is set by the slowest step, no matter how well everything else runs.

What TOC Looks Like in Practice
TOC isn’t about fixing everything at once. It’s about paying attention to the step that’s holding you back and organizing around it. The cycle goes like this:

• Spot the constraint.

• Get as much out of it as you can with what you already have.

• Make sure other processes are supporting it, not working against it.

• If needed, invest or change processes to expand its capacity.

• Then start again with the next constraint.
  

Instead of spreading resources thin, you keep pressure where it makes the biggest difference.

Finding and Dealing With Bottlenecks
Bottlenecks aren’t always sitting in plain sight. Sometimes it’s the usual suspects like a slow machine. Other times it’s inspection, packaging, or even waiting on sign-offs. You’ll see them in the form of long queues, extended wait times, or operators standing around. Mapping the process, timing steps, or using production tracking tools helps bring those hidden delays to the surface.

Once you’ve got the constraint pinned down, the job isn’t just to remove it, it’s to elevate it. That might mean:

• Cutting downtime with better maintenance routine

• Tightening up cycle time through training or setup reduction

• Running some overtime to keep it moving

• Adding small buffers so the bottleneck never runs dry
  

And once you solve that constraint, another one will pop up. That’s expected. Each time you repeat the cycle, you’re pushing the ceiling a little higher.

Buffers and Balance
TOC also calls for smart use of buffers. Not just piles of inventory, but time and capacity cushions that protect the bottleneck from disruptions. A small WIP buffer before the slowest station can keep it running even if upstream hiccups. A time buffer after it can absorb inspection delays or variable downstream tasks.

At the same time, you don’t want the rest of the line working at cross purposes. Line balancing keeps other stations aligned so you’re not trading one delay for another. The goal is to keep the flow steady and making sure the constraint is always working on what matters most.

Capacity management looks very different depending on the type of plant you run. The levers that make a difference in a job shop don’t always translate to a process line, and trying to force one model onto another usually leads to frustration.

High-Mix vs. Low-Mix Manufacturing
In high-mix environments, variety itself is the bottleneck. Running dozens of SKUs in a single day means constant changeovers, tool swaps, and learning curves. Here, capacity gains often come from cutting complexity rather than chasing speed. That could mean:

• Using SMED to shorten changeovers

• Standardizing setups wherever possible

• Cross-training people so you’re not dependent on one operator for one machine

• Digital work instructions to cut ramp-up time on less familiar products

In low-mix, high-volume operations, the picture flips. The work is repetitive, so the big wins come from keeping flow steady. Line balancing, automation, and uptime matter most. A few minutes of unplanned downtime can ripple through the system and cost hours of output.

Discrete vs. Process Industries
Discrete manufacturers like electronics, automotive, machinery tend to wrestle with assembly, inspection, and rework. Their planning revolves around time, materials on hand, and the ability to reconfigure between runs.

Process industries like food, chemicals, or pharmaceuticals play by a different set of rules. Batch timing, cleaning cycles, and regulatory hold periods usually set the pace. Capacity is less about machine speed and more about how you schedule, sequence, and transition without losing valuable hours to waiting.

• Batch scheduling and sequencing

• CIP turnaround times

• Storage or staging space

These details often matter more than how fast any single line can run.

Capacity Levers in Context
An automotive plant and a food plant face different choke points. Auto production usually hinges on takt-driven assembly, capacity gains come from squeezing downtime out of a station or adding modular robotics to handle more variants.

In food manufacturing, cleaning cycles and staging are bigger culprits. Small changes i.e. reducing turnaround between batches, adjusting batch sizes, or staging ingredients better, can free up far more capacity than trying to push equipment faster.

Pulling It Together
The shape of your industry dictates the shape of your bottlenecks. A single framework won’t fit every case. The closer your approach matches your operational reality, the better chance you have of making real gains.

One of the best ways to effectively calculate and maximize production capacity is to leverage digital tools and systems to collect and aggregate production data across your operations.

For example, businesses use apps built with Tulip to connect the equipment and machines running across their operations, collecting real-time data to inform capacity projections. Additionally, Tulip can be used to digitize work instructions and maintenance procedures, reducing any inefficiencies that can come from manual, human input.

Capacity gains come from knowing your true limits and addressing them directly e.g. bottlenecks, downtime, or staffing gaps. Use planning frameworks (lead, lag, match) to align resources with demand, and tailor your approach to the realities of your industry and mix.

If you’re interested in learning how Tulip can help you maximize production capacity and productivity, reach out to a member of our team today!